Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 31 Kan. App. 2d 897 - State v. Legero

31 Kan. App. 2d 897 - State v. Legero’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 2004
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Gleason v. Samaritan Home & Church Mutual Insurance · In re Stephens · State Ex Rel. Stovall v. Meneley · State v. Lashley · Cypress Media, Inc. v. City of Overland Park

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An order binding a defendant over for arraignment does not connote finality of judgment in the district court; there is still an ongoing legal process in the district court before disposition of the case in its entirety and the entry of judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “as used in the statute is defined as a pronouncement of guilt and the determination of punishment. The parties agree that the resolution of this appeal depends upon the construction of the term”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “A defendant shall have the right to appeal from any judgment of a district magistrate judge.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.