Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

310 Ga. 651

Boone v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided December 21, 2020

Supreme Court of Georgia · decided 2020-12-21

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently January 2022

1 state decisions

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Roe, Warden v. Flores-Ortega · Collier v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2020-12-21

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

310 Ga. 651
FINAL COPY

                 S21A0171. BOONE v. THE STATE.


     MELTON, Chief Justice.

     On May 10, 2012, Odeirrick Boone entered a non-negotiated

guilty plea to malice murder and various other offenses in

connection with the robbery of a convenience store and the stabbing

death of the store owner, Balk Sung. On January 31, 2020, Boone

filed a pro se motion for leave to file an out-of-time appeal, arguing

that his trial counsel was ineffective for having failed to inform him

of his right to pursue an appeal of his convictions. The trial court

denied Boone’s motion summarily and without holding a hearing,

which prompted the current appeal. For the reasons that follow, and

as the State properly concedes, the trial court’s order must be

vacated and this case remanded to the trial court to hold a hearing

to determine whether Boone is entitled to an out-of-time appeal due

to the ineffective assistance of his plea counsel.

     “A criminal defendant is entitled to an out-of-time appeal if his
counsel’s constitutionally deficient performance deprived him of an

appeal of right that he otherwise would have pursued.” Collier v.

State, 
307 Ga. 363, 364
 (1) (
834 SE2d 769
) (2019). Where

     the constitutional violation alleged by the defendant is
     ineffective assistance of counsel in providing advice about
     or acting upon an appeal of right [such as an appeal from
     the judgment of conviction entered on a guilty plea], that
     violation is reviewed under the familiar standard of
     Strickland v. Washington, 
466 U. S. 668
 (
104 SCt 2052
,
     80 LE2d 674) (1984). [Cit.] To meet his burden of proving
     that counsel’s ineffectiveness deprived him of his right to
     an appeal, the criminal defendant must show (1) that
     counsel’s representation fell below an objective standard
     of reasonableness, and (2) that counsel’s deficient
     performance prejudiced the defendant. [Cit.]

(Punctuation omitted.) Id. at 364-365 (1).

     However, with regard to the deficient performance prong of the

Strickland test, “we cannot determine whether [Boone’s] counsel

performed deficiently in failing to file a notice of appeal because the

trial court failed to hold an evidentiary hearing on the issue.”

Blackwell v. State, 
306 Ga. 577, 578
 (
832 SE2d 352
) (2019).

Accordingly, we must vacate the trial court’s order denying Boone’s

motion for an out-of-time appeal and remand this case to the trial


                                  2
court for a determination of whether counsel performed deficiently

in failing to inform Boone of his right to a direct appeal from his

guilty plea. See 
Collier, supra,
 
307 Ga. at 376
 (3).

     With respect to the prejudice prong of the Strickland test, we

emphasize that to be granted an out-of-time appeal Boone need not

prove that he would have prevailed in a timely appeal, but only that

“there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s deficient

failure to consult with him about an appeal, he would have timely

appealed.” Ringold v. State, 
304 Ga. 875, 881
 (
823 SE2d 342
) (2019)

(quoting Roe v. Flores-Ortega, 
528 U. S. 470, 484
 (II) (B) (3) (
120 SCt 1029
, 145 LE2d 985) (2000)). See also 
Blackwell, supra,
 
306 Ga. at 578
; 
Collier, supra,
 
307 Ga. at 365
 (1).

     We therefore vacate the trial court’s order denying Boone’s

motion for an out-of-time appeal and remand this case to the trial

court for proceedings consistent with this opinion. See 
Blackwell, supra,
 
306 Ga. at 578
.

   Judgment vacated and case remanded with direction.
Nahmias, P. J., and Boggs, Peterson, Bethel, Ellington, and
McMillian, JJ., concur. Warren, J., not participating.

                                  3
                   DECIDED DECEMBER 21, 2020.
     Murder. Fulton Superior Court. Before Judge Barwick.
     Odeirrek D. Boone, pro se.
     Paul L. Howard, Jr., District Attorney, Lyndsey H. Rudder,
Richard B. Caplan, Assistant District Attorneys; Christopher M.
Carr, Attorney General, Patricia B. Attaway Burton, Deputy
Attorney General, Paula K. Smith, Senior Assistant Attorney
General, Meghan H. Hill, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.




                                 4

/310/ga/651 · .json · Public domain