Randall v. SAIF

                                      204

  Submitted on remand from the Oregon Supreme Court November 21, 2019;
reconsideration allowed on court’s own motion, disposition of the former opinion
              withdrawn, reversed and remanded March 24, 2021


               In the Matter of the Compensation of
                    Mary K. Meyers, Claimant.
                        Michelle RANDALL,
                     Personal Representative of
                   the Estate of Mary K. Meyers,
                             Petitioner,
                                  v.
                       SAIF CORPORATION
                      and Jadent Incorporated,
                           Respondents.
                   Workers’ Compensation Board
                         1303794; A160626
                                 

    On the Court of Appeals’ own motion, the court reconsidered its disposition
in Randall v. SAIF, 

, 

 (2020), rev den, 

 (2021),
which mistakenly affirmed the court’s prior disposition rather than reversing
the Workers’ Compensation Board’s order. The reconsidered disposition is hereby
withdrawn and corrected to “Reversed and remanded.” The prevailing party designation, which misidentifies respondents as the prevailing parties, is corrected
to “Petitioner,” and petitioner is awarded costs.
    Reconsideration allowed on court’s own motion; disposition of the former
opinion withdrawn; reversed and remanded.



  On remand from the Oregon Supreme Court, Randall v.
SAIF, 

, 

 (2019).
    Julene M. Quinn filed the briefs for petitioner.
    Beth Cupani filed the briefs for respondents.
  Before Ortega, Presiding Judge, and Egan, Chief Judge,
and Lagesen, Judge.
    PER CURIAM
   Reconsideration allowed on court’s own motion; disposition of the former opinion withdrawn; reversed and
remanded.
Cite as 

 (2021)                           205

        PER CURIAM
         It has come to our attention that the disposition
in Randall v. SAIF, 

, 

 (2020), mistakenly “affirmed” the court’s prior disposition rather than
reversing the board’s order. The disposition is hereby withdrawn on our own motion and corrected to “Reversed and
remanded.” The prevailing party designation, which misidentifies respondents as the prevailing party, is corrected
to “Petitioner,” and petitioner is awarded costs.
         Reconsideration allowed on court’s own motion;
disposition of the former opinion withdrawn; reversed and
remanded.