Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 311 N.C. 222 - State v. MacCia

State v. MacCia’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

77
cited by 77 later decisions
4
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 70 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 77 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably State v. Bullard (1984), State v. Morgan (1986)

3 federal appellate · 70 state decisions

4301984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wainwright v. Sykes · State v. Williams · Delaware State Board of Education v. Evans · State v. Detter · State v. Corbett

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 77 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Chapter 15A, Article 53, of the General Statutes sets forth the exclusive method for challenging evidence on the ground that its exclusion is constitutionally required. The defendant has the burden of showing that he has complied with the procedural requirements of Article 53. . . . When no exception to the general rule applies, failure to make a timely motion to suppress prior to trial is a waiver of any right to contest the inadmissibility of evidence on constitutional grounds.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[w]here evidence is admitted over objection, and the same evidence has been previously admitted or is later admitted without objection, the benefit of the objection is lost.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.