Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 315 A2D 839 - Wright v. United States

Wright v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
9
states following
August 2021
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 32 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently August 2021 · most notably Byrd v. United States (1991), Matthews v. State (1985)

4 federal appellate · 32 state decisions

130197419801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3651

Relies on Gagnon v. Scarpelli · Burns v. United States · Martin v. State · James v. United States · Cline v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If at any time before the defendant has completed the maximum period of probation, or before he has begun service of his probation, he should commit offenses of such nature as to demonstrate to the court that he is unworthy of probation and that the granting of the same would not be in subservience to the ends of justice and the best interests of the public, or the defendant, the court could revoke ... probation____ [T]he expressed intent of the Court to have him under probation beginning at a future time does not change his position from the possession of a privilege to the enjoyment of a right.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “may and should be construed for revocation purposes as including the term beginning at the time probation is granted. Otherwise, having been granted probation a defendant could commit criminal acts with impunity-as far as revocation of probation is concerned-until he commenced actual service of the probationary period.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “At any time during the probationary term ... the court may revoke the order of probation and cause the rearrest of the probationer and impose a sentence and require him to serve the sentence or pay the fine originally imposed, or both....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.