Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 316 U.S. 52 - Valentine v. Chrestensen

Valentine v. Chrestensen’s Empirical Analysis

316 U.S. 52 · 1942

Citation profile

810
cited by 810 later decisions
111
cited 111 times by the Supreme Court
31
states following
January 2024
most recently cited

230 federal appellate · 54 district · 235 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 810 later decisions (111 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2024 · most notably New York Times Co. v. Sullivan (1964), Central Hudson Gas Electric Corporation v. Public Service Commission of New York (1980)

230 federal appellate · 54 district · 235 state decisions — followed in 31 states

3390194219501960197019801990200020102020decidedoverruled

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. A case is still cited after being overruled — to note the reversal, distinguish it, or in dissent. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedChrestensen v. Valentine (from Second Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on 34 F. Supp. 596 - Chrestensen v. Valentine · Chrestensen v. Valentine

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 810 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the Constitution imposes no such restraint on government as respects purely commercial advertising.”
    17 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “If that evasion were successful, every merchant who desires to broadcast advertising leaflets in the streets need only append a civic appeal, or a moral platitude, to achieve immunity from the law's command.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “that, in truth, he was engaged in the dissemination of matter proper for public information, none the less so because there was inextricably attached to the medium of such dissemination commercial advertising matter.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.