Daniel v. Loveridge’s Empirical Analysis
32 F.3d 1472 · 1994
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 14 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently May 2016 · most notably Adler v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (1998), Cole v. Ruidoso Municipal Schools (1994)
12 federal appellate · 14 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 206 (Equal Pay Act of 1963) · 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 704 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 706 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on St. Mary's Honor Center v. Hicks · United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. Aikens · Coastal Steel Corp. v. Wheelabrator-Frye, Inc. · Roemer v. United States · Loeffler v. Frank
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[ilnterim earnings or amounts earnable with reasonable diligence by the person or persons discriminated against”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.