Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

32 F.3d 562

Docket No. 94-6590.

Denrick Eric Brown v. David A. William D. R. Guillory Layton T. Lester C. N. Lewis

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: July 19, 1994 Decided: August 15, 1994.

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1994-08-15

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently April 1995 · most notably Allen v. Green (1994), Mercer v. Monzack (1995)

26 federal appellate ·

Relies on Ortega v. Geelhaar

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1994-08-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District Judge. (CA-92-1191-AM)

Denrick Eric Brown, Appellant Pro Se.

E.D.Va.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

Before HALL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Denrick Brown appeals the dismissal of his complaint for failure to pay a court-ordered partial filing fee. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, reverse, and remand.

¶2

The district court imposed a partial filing fee in excess of 20% of the aggregate amount deposited in Appellant's account in the six months prior to submission of the complaint. This assessment violated Local Rule 28(C) for the Eastern District of Virginia, which only permits a partial filing fee "not in excess of 20% of the aggregate deposits" in the preceding six months. See Ortega v. Geelhaar, 914 F.2d 495, 498 (4th Cir.1990) (district court must abide by local rules adopted by court).

¶3

Accordingly, we reverse the order of dismissal and remand with instructions to recalculate the partial filing fee in accordance with Local Rule 28(C). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented and argument would not aid the decisional process.

REVERSED AND REMANDED

/32/f3d/562 · .json · Public domain