32 F.3d 563

Gene Ellis WILLIAMS, Plaintiff Appellant, v. Edwin A. MEESE, III; Charles E. Lyons; Richard Thornburgh; Robert D. Potter, United States District Court Judge; Larry Galloway; M. v. HOLT, Badge number 676; S. T. Mulhall, Badge number 1731; James G. Martin; Lacy H. Thornburg, Attorney General of the State of North Carolina; Chief of Police, City of Charlotte, North Carolina; M. D. Henderson, Badge number 1674; C. D. Hatley, Badge number 1860; W. T. Pearce, Badge number 1337; T. W. Ross, Badge number SB-018; J. E. Sorrow, Badge number 507; David A. Russell, Attorney; Lyle Yurko, Attorney; North Carolina, Defendants Appellees.

No. 94-6561.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 19, 1994.
Decided: August 15, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, District Judge. (CA-92-324)

Gene Ellis Williams, Appellant Pro Se.

W.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL, LUTTIG,* and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Williams v. Meese, No. CA-92-324 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 15, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Judge Luttig did not participate in consideration of this case. The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 46(d)