Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

32 F.3d 571

Docket No. 93-3965.

Saxton v. Beamer

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: July 19, 1994. Filed: August 2, 1994.

This page is marked noindex.

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1994-07-19

Relies on United States v. Long

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1994-07-19

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that no party may cite an opinion not intended for publication unless the cases are related by identity between the parties or the causes of action.

Before MAGILL, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

Harry E. and Ruth B. Saxton appeal the district court's1 dismissal of their abuse-of-process complaint. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude that no error of fact or law appears and that an opinion would lack precedential value. Thus, we affirm the judgment of the district court without further discussion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We deny the Saxtons' motions to strike the appellees' brief.

1

The Honorable Ronald E. Longstaff, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa

/32/f3d/571 · .json · Public domain