Zell v. Ricci’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 20 U.S.C. § 1400 (Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975) · 28 U.S.C. § 1367 · 29 U.S.C. § 794 · 42 U.S.C. § 12102 (§ 3 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12132 (§ 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York · Morrissey v. Brewer · Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County v. Brown
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“not an 'elaborate hearing before' a neutral party, but simply 'an informal give-and-take between student and disciplinarian' which gives the student 'an opportunity to explain his version of the facts.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Zell v. Ricci“Defendants are vicariously responsible and responsible for the acts and omissions of the Defendants' agents under the theory of respondeat superior.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Zell v. Ricci“there was a lack of some needed policy or some related failure by the school district to handle the situation, including [Zell]'s concussion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Zell v. Ricci
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.