559
This is a nonprecedential memorandum opinion
pursuant to ORAP 10.30 and may not be cited
except as provided in ORAP 10.30(1).
Submitted September 2, affirmed October 26, 2022
STATE OF OREGON,
Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
MIGUEL ROBLETO,
Defendant-Appellant.
Lane County Circuit Court
21VI82213; A177526
Bradley A. Cascagnette, Judge.
Miguel Robleto filed the brief pro se.
Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman,
Solicitor General, and Emily N. Snook, Assistant Attorney
General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Tookey, Presiding Judge, and Egan, Judge, and
Kamins, Judge.
KAMINS, J.
Affirmed.
560 State v. Robleto
KAMINS, J.
Defendant appeals from a judgment finding him
guilty of the violation of failure to obey traffic control devices,
ORS 811.265, and challenges the sufficiency of the evidence
supporting the trial court’s findings. Viewing the evidence
in the light most favorable to the state, as is required by our
standard of review, we conclude that a reasonable trier of
fact could have found the essential elements of the violation
had been proved. See State v. Hashoosh,
(2020) (stating the standard of review for
traffic violation cases). Specifically, there was sufficient evidence to support the finding that when the traffic light was
red, defendant failed to stop his vehicle before crossing the
stop line, and we are not permitted to reweigh that evidence
on appeal. See ORS 811.260(7) (requiring that a “driver facing a steady circular red signal light alone shall stop at a
clearly marked stop line”).
Affirmed.
