324 So. 2d 690 - Moore v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

14 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““.. . we conceive that the former strictures of 775.11 requiring the full panoply of information, arraignment and trial on the issue of identity, do not apply when the fact of the recidivist’s prior conviction of a felony appears to the sentencing judge before or at the time of the adjudication and sentence for the subsequent offense.” (emphasis added)”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Smith · 343 So. 2d 601 - Moore v. State

2. “to afford an opportunity for the State to seek the extended term of commitment provided for by § 775.084 when, through oversight, the fact of the previous conviction did not appear or become known to the court or prosecutor until `after sentence or conviction' for the subsequent offense.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 343 So. 2d 601 - Moore v. State

3. “evidences legislative intent that the provisions of § 775.084, which continues in effect, be utilized in accordance with due process of law independent of former § 775.11.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 343 So. 2d 601 - Moore v. State