Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

329 S.C. 400

In re Pryor

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 9, 1998

Supreme Court of South Carolina · decided 1998-02-09

Applies SC 8 § 8-1-80

Decided 1998-02-09

PER CURIAM:

¶1In this judicial disciplinary matter, respondent and Disciplinary Counsel have entered into an agreement under Rule 21, RJDE, Rule 502, SCACR. In the agreement, respondent admits misconduct and consents to a public reprimand. We accept the agreement.

¶2Respondent is a former Spartanburg County Magistrate. On or about October 10, 1997, respondent pled guilty to one count of misconduct in office pursuant to S.C.Code Ann. § 8-1-80 (Supp.1997). This is a serious crime as defined in Rule 2(z), RJDE. By his conduct, respondent has also violated Rules 7(a)(1) (violation of the Code of Judicial Conduct) and 7(a)(3) (conviction of a serious crime), RJDE, as well as the following provisions of the Code of Judicial Conduct, Rule 501, SCACR: Section 1A (failure to maintain and observe high standards of conduct to preserve the independence and integ*402rity of the judiciary); Section 2(A) (failure to respect and comply with the law, and failure to conduct himself in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity of the judiciary); and Section 3(B)(2) (failure to be faithful to the law and maintain professional competence in it).

¶3Because respondent is no longer a magistrate and because he has agreed to not hereafter seek nor accept any judicial position within the State of South Carolina, we have decided to accept the agreement for a public reprimand. Accordingly, respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded for his conduct.

¶4PUBLIC REPRIMAND.

BURNETT, J., not participating.
/329/sc/400 · .json · Public domain