¶1An office copy is not evidence that a paper, of which it is a transcript, was a genuine paper.
¶2The demandants claim by inheritance from the grantee in the supposed deed. The rule of the Court, allowing office copies, touching the realty, does not authorize the use of a copy by the heirs of a grantee.
¶3There is then no competent evidence that a deed from Daniel Webster to James Webster ever had an existence.
¶4Nonsuit confirmed.