Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

33 Me. 575

Scudder v. Davis

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided July 1, 1852

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · decided 1852-07-01

On Report from Nisi Prius, Shepley, C. J. presiding. Assumpsit. The trustees come, and by their disclosures admit indebtedness to the principal defendants. The principal defendants filed a plea in abatement. This was followed by a replication and a rejoinder, upon which an issue to the county was taken. The ground of the claim to have the writ abated, was, that the suit is brought in the wrong county.

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 1929

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1852-07-01

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Howard, J., orally.

¶1— The case is submitted for judgment as the rights of the parties may require. A consideration of the pleadings is therefore unnecessary. The evidence shows that the trustees have their established and usual place of business in the county of Lincoln, and there held their last annual meeting, and for several of the last years have usually held their meetings there.

¶2The statute ch. 119, <§> 5, is imperative that, upon such facts the action should be brought in that county alone.

¶3The plaintiffs however have contended that this provision of the statute was for the benefit of the trustees only, and may therefore be waived by them. But the language is unambiguous and clear. We have no choice but to give it effect as it reads.

¶4As the action could not rightfully be commenced for this county, it cannot be maintained here.

¶5Writ abated.

/33/me/575 · .json · Public domain