33 N.J. 299
164 A.2d 299
Decided October 10, 1960
Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1960-10-10
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1960-10-10
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently December 1993
4 district · 10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1 The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of Judge Haneman in the court below.
¶2 Mr. Chief Justice Weintbaub and Mr. Justice Schettino vote to reverse the judgment for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Ereund.
¶3 For affirmance — Justices Bueling, Jacobs, Ebancis, Pkoctok and Hall — 5.
¶4 For reversal — Chief Justice Weinteatjb, and Justice Schettino — 2.