Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

331 F.2d 604

Docket No. 20861.

Siegel v. Tyson

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1964-05-15

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently November 1969

1 district ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on United States v. Flowers

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1964-05-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Charles B. Fulton, Judge.

Daniel S. Pearson, Irwin J. Block, Miami, Fla., for appellant.

John B. Jones, Jr., Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Louis F. Oberdorfer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Washington, D. C., William A. Meadows, Jr., U. S. Atty., Miami, Fla., Joseph M. Howard, Burton Berkley, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., Edward A. Kaufman, Asst. U. S. Atty. of counsel, for appellees.

Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, WISDOM, Circuit Judge, and McRAE,* District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

As announced from the bench during oral argument, the appeal is without merit and the judgment is affirmed. The stay is thereby vacated. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

Notes:

*

District Judge, sitting by designation

/331/f2d/604 · .json · Public domain