Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 333 F.3d 1199 - Olsen v. Mapes

Olsen v. Mapes’s Empirical Analysis

333 F.3d 1199 · 2003

Citation profile

61
cited by 61 later decisions
1
states following
December 2025
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 61 later decisions — most recently December 2025 · most notably Cohen v. Longshore (2010), Nasious v. Two Unknown B.I.C.E. Agents (2007)

9 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

330200320102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915

Relies on Link v. Wabash Railroad · Mobley v. McCormick · Ehrenhaus v. Reynolds · Young v. Quinlan · Romandette v. Weetabix Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the degree of actual prejudice to the defendant; (2) the amount of interference with the judicial process; (3) the culpability of the litigant; (4) whether the court warned the party in advance that dismissal of the action would be a likely sanction for noncompliance; and (5) the efficacy of lesser sanctions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Although the language or Rule 41(b) requires that the defendant file a motion to dismiss, the Rule has long been interpreted to permit courts to dismiss actions sua sponte for a plaintiff's failure to prosecute or comply with the rules of civil procedure or court orders.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.