Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 334 Pa. Super. 203 - Commonwealth v. Britton

334 Pa. Super. 203 - Commonwealth v. Britton’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
1
states following
June 2025
most recently cited

30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently June 2025 · most notably 382 Pa. Super. 127 - Commonwealth v. Greer (1989), 434 Pa. Super. 309 - Commonwealth v. Anderson (1994)

30 state decisions

15019851990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Commonwealth v. Allen · Commonwealth v. Young · Commonwealth v. Goosby · Commonwealth v. McCusker · Commonwealth v. England

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The court correctly curtailed the attorney’s remarks explaining to the jury that it was his role to instruct as to the law. It is the duty of the trial judge to instruct the jury as to the applicable law, and it is not error for the judge to interrupt counsel and correct a possibly misleading statement of the law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Judges should refrain from extended examination of witnesses; they should not, during the trial, indicate an opinion on the merits, a doubt as to the witnesses’s [sic] credibility, or do anything to indicate a leaning to one side or the other, without explaining to the jury that all these matters are for them.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.