¶1dissenting:
¶2For the reasons set forth in Chief Judge Wilner’s opinion for the Court of Special Appeals, Giddens v. State, 97 Md.App. 582, 631 A.2d 499 (1993), we would affirm the judgment of the Court of Special Appeals.
335 Md. 205
642 A.2d 870
Decided June 10, 1994
Court of Appeals of Maryland · decided 1994-06-10
Relies on 97 Md. App. 582 - Giddens v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1994-06-10
Cited by 67 later decisions — most recently November 2020 · most notably Conyers v. State (1999), King v. State (2009)
67 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1dissenting:
¶2For the reasons set forth in Chief Judge Wilner’s opinion for the Court of Special Appeals, Giddens v. State, 97 Md.App. 582, 631 A.2d 499 (1993), we would affirm the judgment of the Court of Special Appeals.