337 F.2d 856
Docket No. 7795.
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
Oct. 22, 1964.
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1964-10-22
2 counsel of record
Relies on 234 F. Supp. 866 - Johnson v. Tinsley · Harris v. United States
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1964-10-22
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently April 1981
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
Richard J. Beacom, Westminster, Colo., for appellant.
Duke W. Dunbar, Atty. Gen., Frank E. Hickey, Deputy Atty. Gen., and John E. Bush, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, and HILL and SETH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the trial court, denying the writ of habeas corpus, is affirmed for the reasons so ably expressed by the opinion of that court reported in 234 F.Supp. 866.