¶1Henry R. Carr, Wm. B. Seidel, Miami, Fla., for appellant.
¶2Alfred E. Sapp, Asst. U. S. Atty., Miami, Fla., William A. Meadows, Jr., U. S. Atty., for appellee.
¶3Before JONES and GEWIN, Circuit Judges, and ESTES, District Judge.
¶5The appellant seeks reversal of a conviction by the district court, without a jury, of a Mann Act violation. The contention on appeal is that the evidence was insufficient to permit a finding of guilt. We have reviewed the evidence and conclude that the district court’s determination was fully justified. Its judgment is
¶6Affirmed.