Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 338 SO2D 269 - Schachter v. State

Schachter v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
3
states following
November 2005
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently November 2005

10 state decisions

601976198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on City of St. Petersburg v. Calbeck · State v. Crum

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “only be sustained as the actions of a private citizen who has the right to arrest a person who commits a felony in his presence. . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “in no way constituted a felony and the arrest by Magil was invalid as a private citizen”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the trial court was without jurisdiction to try [him].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.