Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

34 F. 739

Falk v. Howell

United States Circuit Court for the Southern District of New York · decided 1888-03-31

<p>COI’VItlOHT — IXERTXOEiraN'T—BlLL TO ENJOIK — AMBIGUITY.</p> <p>A hill to enjoin the infringement of an alleged copyright, alleging dis-junctively. in the language of itev St. II. S. § 4S156, (which prescribes the prerequisites to the obtaining of a copyright,) that orator “before publication, do-livered at the office of the librarian of congress, or mailed to said librarian, a copy of the title of said photograph,” is ambiguous, and tenders no issue.</p>

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently April 1926

1 federal appellate · 1 district ·

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1888-03-31

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1COI’VItlOHT — IXERTXOEiraN'T—BlLL TO ENJOIK — AMBIGUITY.

¶2A hill to enjoin the infringement of an alleged copyright, alleging dis-junctively. in the language of itev St. II. S. § 4S156, (which prescribes the prerequisites to the obtaining of a copyright,) that orator “before publication, do-livered at the office of the librarian of congress, or mailed to said librarian, a copy of the title of said photograph,” is ambiguous, and tenders no issue.

¶3In Equity. On bill for injunction.

¶4I. N. Falle, for complainant.

¶5Anion/,, Fitch & Woodford, for defendant.

¶6La coin®, J.

¶7Tills is an application for a preliminary injunction to restrain the infringement of an alleged copyright of a photograph. The statute (Rev. St. ü. S. § 4956) provides that “no person shall bo entitled to a copyright unless he shall, before publication, deliver at the office of the librarian of congress, or deposit in the mail, addressed to the librarian of congress, a copy of the title of the article for which he desires a copyright, nor unless he shall also, within ten days from the publication thereof, deliver at the office of the librarian of congress, or deposit in the mail, addressed to the librarian of congress, two copies of such article.” The complainant in this case does not show that he delivered a copy of the title at the office of the librarian, nor that lie deposited the same in the mail, addressed to such officer; neither does he slioiv that he delivered the two copies required by the statute, at such office, nor that he deposited the same in the mail, addressed as therein required. The averments in the bill referring to these statutory requirements are as follows:

“ Before the publication $ your orator delivered at the office of the librarian of congress, or deposited in the mail, addressed to the librarian of congress, at Washington, i). C., a printed copy of the title of said photograph, and also within ten days from the publication thereof delivered at the office of tire librarian of congress. or deposited in the mail, addressed to the librarian of congress, at Washington, I). 0., two copies,” etc.

¶8This is alternative pleading. It is ambiguous and tenders no issue, and is not a sufficient averment of compliance with the statutory requisites. The motion is denied, with leave to renew upon other papers.

/34/f1d/739 · .json · Public domain