Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

34 F.3d 1066

Docket No. 94-6253.

Boyd v. Fox

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted July 19, 1994 Decided Aug. 4, 1994.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1994-08-04

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Peter F. McConaughy Jacqueline W. McConaughy v. United States

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1994-08-04

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District Judge. (CA-93-7-R)

Samuel Boyd, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Sandra Morris Holleran, McGuire, Woods, Battle & Boothe, Richmond, V.; Gary Elton Tegenkamp, Wooten & Hart, P.C.; Robert Harkness Herring, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Mary Christine Maggard, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Va., for appellees.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Boyd v. Fox, No. CA-93-7-R (W.D.Va. Jan. 31, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/34/f3d/1066 · .json · Public domain