Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1952-01-02
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2003
10 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
¶2and the case is remanded to the District Court for specific findings as to the circumstances attending appellee’s service in the Japanese Army and voting in the Japanese elections and the reasonable inferences to be drawn therefrom.
Mr. Justice Black is of. the opinion the judgment should be affirmed.Mr. Justice Douglas, being of the view that the findings are adequate to show that the services' of appellee to Japan were rendered under the.compulsion *900of military and other sanctions, evidenced in some instances by physical beatings, dissents to vacation and remand.Solicitor General Perlman and Howard K. Hod-dick for appellant.A. Li Wirin, Fred Okrand and Katsuo Miho for appellee.