Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 347 F.2d 486 - Frank v. United States

Frank v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

347 F.2d 486 · 1965

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
7
states following
March 2008
most recently cited

19 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2008 · most notably Katz v. United States (1967), United States v. Frierson (1991)

19 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

10019651970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 47 U.S.C. § 301 · 47 U.S.C. § 318 · 47 U.S.C. § 409 · 47 U.S.C. § 501 · 47 U.S.C. § 502

Relies on Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor · Abel v. United States · United States v. Jeffers · Piemonte v. United States · Gordan v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'subjected to * * * penalty' not only by the previous conviction but by the subsequent affirmance.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “no individual shall be prosecuted or subjected to any penalty or forfeiture for or on account of any transaction, matter, or thing concerning which he is compelled, after having claimed his privilege against self-incrimination, to testify or produce evidence, documentary or otherwise, except that any individual so testifying shall not be exempt from prosecution and punishment for perjury committed in so testifying.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.