Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 349 F.3d 371 - Collins v. Hamilton

Collins v. Hamilton’s Empirical Analysis

349 F.3d 371 · 2003

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
1
states following
July 2018
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1396 (§ 1900 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1396D (§ 1905 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Wilder v. Virginia Hospital Assn. · Hilt-Dyson v. City of Chicago · Pediatric Speciality Care, Inc. v. Arkansas Department of Human Services · Plummer v. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) success ... on the merits; (2) irreparable harm; (3) that the benefits of granting the injunction outweigh the injury to the defendant; and, (4) that the public interest will not be harmed by the relief requested.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Lacy v. Cook Cnty. · Henderson v. Adams
  2. “[s]uch other necessary health care, diagnostic services, treatment, and other measures described in subsection (a) of this section to correct or ameliorate defects and physical and mental illnesses and conditions discovered by the screening services, whether or not such services are covered under the State plan.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. 366 F. Supp. 2d 1050 - OKLAHOMA CHAP. OF AMER. ACA., PEDIAT. v. Fogarty · Sd Dickson v. Hood
  3. “a state's discretion to exclude services deemed `medically necessary' ... has been circumscribed by the express mandate of the statute”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Sd Dickson v. Hood

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.