349 So. 2d 698 - Johnson v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
1977
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently October 2011
2 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 56 So. 2d 329 - City Ice & Fuel Division v. Smith · Craft v. Craft · 58 So. 2d 527 - Le Cain v. Becker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In the light of these circumstances, it would be inequitable and contrary to the original intent of the parties for the husband to retain full title to The Harborage. When Mrs. Johnson conveyed her interest in The Harborage to her husband, she became the beneficiary under a constructive trust and he became the trustee... . A beneficiary under a constructive trust is entitled to have his original interest restored, and to be re-established in his title. [cite omitted].”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“is entitled to have his original interest restored, and to be reestablished in his title.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.