Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

35 Pa. 276

Meeker v. Brackney

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 1, 1860

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 1860-07-01

This was a scire facias by John W. Brackney against David L. JMeeker, reciting a recognisance of bail for an appeal from the judgment of a justice of the peace. The defendant pleaded nul tiel record.

Decided 1860-07-01

Per Curiam.

¶1— A recognisance ia a contract of record, with a *277condition. What is the condition of this one ? There is nothing on the record to show. It is said, that the cause was carried to court by appeal, and therefore the condition must have been that the principal should prosecute his appeal according to law. But no appeal is entered on the justice’s docket, and therefore it does not appear that the bail was for an appeal. We cannot supply the defects of the recognisance, by subsequent acts between the original parties to the suit. It is said, that no bail is admissible in a suit against a constable for neglect of duty, except bail for an appeal. But the justice and the bail may have been ignorant of this. If we should presume they knew all that the law required, we should have a ready way of correcting all bad recognisances. When sitting in error, the presumption that the justice knows the law, is not very availing.

¶2Judgment reversed, and judgment for the defendant below, with costs.

/35/pa/276 · .json · Public domain