Stephens v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
354 F.2d 999 · 1965
Citation profile
22 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002)
Relies on Berger v. United States · Riggs v. United States · Milam v. United States · Steiner v. United States · Steiner v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“viewing the evidence presented most favorable to the Government, a reasonable-minded jury could accept the relevant and admissible evidence as (adequate) and sufficient to support the conclusion of the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.