Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 355 SE2D 250 - State v. Hall

State v. Hall’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
2
states following
March 2016
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently March 2016

20 state decisions

601987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cole v. United States · Pell v. Procunier · Williamson v. United States · State v. McClain · State v. McClain

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In cases involving sexual offenses, our courts have been liberal in construing the exceptions to the general rule that evidence that defendant committed another, separate offense is inadmissible. Whether a defendant's previous conviction for a sexual offense is pertinent in his prosecution for an independent sexual crime depends on the facts in each case, and, among other things, the availability of other forms of proof.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]he State is not required to show that the defendant made an actual physical attempt to have intercourse .... The element of intent as to the offense of attempted rape is established if the evidence shows that defendant, at any time during the incident, had an intent to gratify his passion upon the victim, notwithstanding any resistance on her part.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “sexually motivated assaults may give rise to an inference that defendant intended to rape his victim notwithstanding that other inferences also are possible.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.