356 N.J. Super. 71 - Brown v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
2 district · 15 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 12131 (§ 201 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12132 (§ 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990)
Relies on McGowan v. State of Maryland Gallagher · Board of Trustees of the University of Alabamas v. Patricia Garrett · Bowen v. Gilliard · Aetna Life Insurance v. Lavoie · Greenberg v. Kimmelman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“analysis `employ[s] a balancing test' and when `striking the balance,' a court must consider `the nature of the affected right, the extent to which the governmental restriction intrudes upon it, and the public need for the restriction.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Statutes carry a strong presumption in favor of constitutionality, and the proponent of invalidity bears the heavy burden of overcoming that presumption.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“not second[-]guess the Legislature's `policy decisions' regarding `economic, social, and philosophical'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.