Miller v. Postmaster General’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 703 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 704 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Reeb v. Economic Opportunity Atlanta, Inc. · Pacheco v. Mineta · Manning v. Chevron Chemical Co., LLC · Richardson v. Monitronics International, Inc. · Blumberg v. HCA Management Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the pendency of a suit between the same parties in the wrong forum; (2) the plaintiff's lack of awareness of the facts supporting his claim because of the defendant's intentional concealment of them; and (3) the EEOC’s misleading the plaintiff about his rights.” Manning v. Chevron Chem. Co. LLC, 332 F.3d 874, 880 (5th Cir.2003). None of these conditions are applicable in this case. 3 . In his Response, Plaintiff includes one poster titled”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“In Title VII cases, ‘the limitations period starts running when the plaintiff knows of the discriminatory act.’”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.