Brady v. Livingood’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
29 district ·
Relationships
Applies 2 U.S.C. § 1302 · 2 U.S.C. § 1402 · 2 U.S.C. § 1403 · 2 U.S.C. § 1404 · 2 U.S.C. § 1408 · 42 U.S.C. § 1985 · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 704 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Griggs v. Duke Power Co. · National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. Morgan · Griffin v. Breckenridge · Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination Unit
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“plaintiff must set forth more than just conclusory allegations of [the] agreement.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“April 10, 2001” and that “April 10, 2002” is a typographical error. 4 . Plaintiff is alleged to have approached an African-American female employee and asked her, “May I please use your restroom?” while grabbing his pants in the genital area. (Am. Comply 29.) 5 . The Office of the Sergeant at Arms subsequently conducted an internal investigation of the alleged incident (Def.'s Mot. for Summ. J. at 7), ultimately concluding that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Brady v. Livingood“(1) a conspiracy; (2) for the purpose of depriving, either directly or indirectly, any person or class of persons of the equal protection of the laws, ... and (3) an act in furtherance of the conspiracy; (4) whereby a person is either injured in her person or property or deprived of any right or privilege of a citizen of the United States.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.