Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 362 FSUPP3D 25 - Brader v. Biogen Inc.

Brader v. Biogen Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

2019

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
December 2020
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 42 U.S.C. § 12102 (§ 3 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12112 (§ 102 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12131 (§ 201 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12203 (§ 503 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 704 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. Morgan · Delaware State College v. Ricks · Mesnick v. General Electric Co. · Withrow v. Williams

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) []he engaged in protected conduct; (2) []he was subjected to an adverse employment action; and (3) the adverse employment action is causally linked to the protected conduct.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “A moving party is to be spared a trial when there is no genuine issue of any material fact on the record and that party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “committed to working together with [Brader] to help him be successful and to strengthen [their] working relationship.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.