367 N.C. 160
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided November 8, 2013
Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 2013-11-08
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 2015
1 state decisions
Key passage — most relied on by later courts
“For the reasons stated in [ Mehaffey v. Burger King, 367 N.C. 120 , 749 S.E.2d 252 (2013) ], the decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed as to the matter on appeal to this Court, and this case is remanded to that court for further remand to the Industrial Commission for further proceedings not inconsistent with Mehaffey.”
quoted by 1 later decision, including 244 N.C. App. 155 - Chandler v. Atl. Scrap & Processing, Emp'r, & Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.
“[f]or the reasons stated in Mehaffey [.]”
quoted by 1 later decision, including 244 N.C. App. 155 - Chandler v. Atl. Scrap & Processing, Emp'r, & Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2013-11-08
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1For the reasons stated in Mehaffey v. Burger King,_N.C._, _ S.E.2d __ (2013) (No. 24PA12), the decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed as to the matter on appeal to this Court, and this case is remanded to that court for further remand to the Industrial Commission for further proceedings not inconsistent with Mehaffey.
¶2AFFIRMED AND REMANDED.
¶3dissents for the reasons stated in his opinion in Mehaffey v. Burger King,_N.C._,__S.E.2d_(2013).