Chandler v. Atlantic Scrap & Processing’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “For the reasons stated in [ Mehaffey v. Burger King, 367 N.C. 120 , 749 S.E.2d 252 (2013) ], the decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed as to the matter on appeal to this Court, and this case is remanded to that court for further remand to the Industrial Commission for further proceedings not inconsistent with Mehaffey.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 244 N.C. App. 155 - Chandler v. Atl. Scrap & Processing, Emp'r, & Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.

2. “[f]or the reasons stated in Mehaffey [.]”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 244 N.C. App. 155 - Chandler v. Atl. Scrap & Processing, Emp'r, & Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.