Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

37 F.3d 1493

Docket No. 93-6546.

Harris v. Braves Md

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted September 2, 1993. Decided October 6, 1994.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently August 2003

1 state decisions

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Halsey v. Sams

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (CA-92-3037-JFM)

Richard Harris, appellant pro se.

Philip Melton Andrews, Geoffrey Hawthorne Genth, Kramon & Graham, P.A., Baltimore, MD, for appellees.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Harris v. Braves, No. CA-92-3037-JFM (D. Md. May 13, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/37/f3d/1493 · .json · Public domain