Easom v. US Well Services’s Empirical Analysis
2022
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 2102 (§ 3 of the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 2107 (§ 8 of the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act) · 7 U.S.C. § 1508
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Robinson v. Shell Oil Co. · Perrin v. United States · United States v. Williams · Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. Burr
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Such regulations shall, at a minimum, include interpretative regulations describing the methods by which employers may provide for appropriate service of notice as required by this chapter.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Roberts v. Genting“Hotel Emps. & Rest. Emps. Int'l Union Loc. 54 v. Elsinore Shore Assocs., 173 F.3d 175 , 182 (3d Cir. 1999). During that period, companies”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Roberts v. Genting
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.