Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

37 Me. 203

Abbott v. Goodwin

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided July 1, 1854

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · decided 1854-07-01

On Exceptions from Nisi Prius, Howard, J., presiding. Assumpsit, on a balance of account for hard and soft wood joists. The parties lived in the town of Shapleigh. Evidence was introduced tending to show that the plaintiff contracted with the defendant for 3 M. feet hard wood, and 5 M. feet soft wood .joists, to be delivered on the line of the York and Cumberland rail road in the town of Sanford. They were delivered according to the agreement.

Decided 1854-07-01

Hathaway, J..

¶1— On the 17th of December, 1850, the defendant contracted with the plaintiff to get for him a quantity of joists, and to deliver them on the line of the York and Cumberland Rail Road, in Sanford. The plaintiff performed-the contract on-his-part) and the - defendant ‘ received the joists upon an estimate satisfactory to himself, at the time, and refuses to pay for them, because, as he alleges, they were not surveyed by a sworn surveyor, as required by statute, c. 66, § 2, which provides that “timber, &c., offered for sale” shall be thus surveyed, previous to delivery. The case does not find that the joists were offered for sale by the plaintiff. He procured them on contract, for the defendant, and the defendant received them, and there is no honest or legal reason apparent, why he should not pay for them. Coombs v. Emery, 14 Maine, 404.

¶2Exceptions overruled. Judgment on the verdict.

Shbpley, C. J., and Rice and Cutting, J. J., concurred.
/37/me/203 · .json · Public domain