Dirring v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
370 F.2d 862 · 1967
Citation profile
31 federal appellate · 23 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 61 later decisions — most recently June 2016 · most notably Barrett v. United States (1992), United States v. Butt (1984)
31 federal appellate · 23 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Smith v. Crouse · Idaho Sheet Metal Works, Inc. v. Wirtz · Fisher v. United States · Massiah v. United States · Huggins v. Raines
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'[I]ssues disposed of in a prior appeal will not be reviewed again by way of a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.