Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 370 So. 2d 1142 - State v. Tomas

370 So. 2d 1142 - State v. Tomas’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
2
states following
February 2007
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently February 2007

12 state decisions

701979198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 362 So. 2d 10 - State v. Allen · 238 So. 2d 618 - State v. Graham · Barket v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"An examination of this enactment [§ 812.019(1), Fla. Stat. (1979)] reveals nothing to support the conclusion that persons could be convicted under its provisions for conduct that is essentially innocent in nature. The terms `traffic' and `stolen property' are defined in sections 812.012(6) and (7), from which it is clear that the statute applies only to certain acts relating to the disposition of `property that has been the subject of any criminally wrongful taking.' The term `endeavors' has recently been construed by us in the context of a closely related provision to mean `an overt act manifesting criminal intent.' (citation omitted)." Id. at 1143.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “section 812.019(1) is not unconstitutionally overbroad, but is sufficiently confined in its applicability so as not to reach conduct that is essentially innocent”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.