Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

370 U.S. 293

78 S. Ct. 974

2 L. Ed. 2d 1060

Docket No. 841, Misc.

Seelig v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

June 18, 1962

Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1962-06-18

Relies on Coppedge v. United States · Ellis v. United States · Milutin v. Bouchard

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1962-06-18

How this case has been cited

Cited by 468 later decisions (33 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2021 · most notably Anders v. California (1967), Penson v. Ohio (1988)

263 federal appellate · 18 district · 89 state decisions — followed in 26 states

25001962197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Frederick Seelig, pro se.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Marshall, Harold H. Greene and Howard A. Glickstein, for the United States.

On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

In accordance with the suggestion of the Solicitor General and upon consideration of the entire record, the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for reconsideration in the light of Ellis v. United States, 356 U.S. 674, 78 S.Ct. 974, 2 L.Ed.2d 1060, and Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 82 S.Ct. 917.

¶2

Mr. Justice FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

/370/us/293 · .json · Public domain