Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

372 F.2d 96

Docket No. 15907.

Puchalski v. Yeager

Third Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Nov. 4, 1966.

Decided Feb. 1, 1967.

Third Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1967-02-01

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently February 1967

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on State v. Puchalski

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1967-02-01

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Anthony M. Puchalski, pro se.

¶2Guy W. Calissi, Bergen County Prosecutor, Hackensack, N. J. (Harold N. Springstead, Asst. Prosecutor, on the brief), for appellee.

¶3Before GANEY, SMITH and FREED MAN, Circuit Judges.

¶4OPINION OF THE COURT

¶5PER CURIAM.

¶6The appellant, in custody, under the judgment of a State court, was tried on an indictment charging him with homicide and was convicted of murder in the second degree. The judgment of conviction was sustained on appeal to the Supreme Court of New Jersey, State v. Puchalski, 45 N.J. 97, 211 A.2d 370. The matter came before the court below on a petition for habeas corpus in which the appellant attacked the validity of his conviction on grounds substantially the same as those urged on the said appeal. The petition was dismissed and this appeal followed.

¶7It appears from the well reasoned opinion of the court below that the questions raised were carefully considered and properly decided against the appellant.

¶8The judgment of the court below will be affirmed.

/372/f2d/96 · .json · Public domain