Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 372 F.2d 97 - Charney v. Thomas

Charney v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis

372 F.2d 97 · 1967

Citation profile

92
cited by 92 later decisions
2
states following
February 2006
most recently cited

44 federal appellate · 10 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 92 later decisions — most recently February 2006 · most notably Globus v. Law Research Service, Inc. (1969), Vanderboom v. Sexton (1970)

44 federal appellate · 10 district · 2 state decisions

57019671970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Hoosier Cardinal Corp. · Chattanooga Foundry & Pipe Works v. City of Atlanta · Campbell v. City of Haverhill · John B. Janigan v. Frederick B. Taylor · Fratt v. Robinson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 92 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Although in some cases the Local Blue Sky Law might be the more appropriate point of reference, in the present case the Michigan law contains no provision similar to section 10(b) of the federal law. Thus, the normal six-year period of M.S.A. § 27A.5813 should apply despite the fact that actions under section 10(b) are not exactly the same as common law fraud actions.””
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “'(T)he Federal Courts must choose among the several state statutes of limitations and apply that one which best effectuates the federal policy at issue.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “period of limitations applicable to plaintiffs' federal claim under the Security Exchange Act of 1934 must likewise be determined by reference to Michigan law . . .. (T)he Federal Courts must choose among the several state statutes of limitation and apply that one which best effectuates the federal policy at issue.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.