Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 375 So. 2d 1237 - Bayne v. State

375 So. 2d 1237 - Bayne v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 1992
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently June 1992

4 state decisions

20197819801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lane v. State · Lámar v. State · Yarber v. State · Kirksey v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[c]ounsel should be given wide latitude in arguing to the jury; and only where the defendant is prejudiced by the state's argument is reversal mandated.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.