Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 375 So. 2d 1295 - Austin v. State

375 So. 2d 1295 - Austin v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
October 1985
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Morrissey v. Brewer · Gagnon v. Scarpelli · Armstrong v. State · 40 Ala. App. 587 - Fiorella v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A cursory reading of the record in this cause is sufficient for a determination that the proceedings in the court below were wholly deficient under the above cited authorities.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “In revoking probation a trial judge must make a written statement as to the evidence relied on and the reasons for revoking probation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “written statement by the trial judge as to the evidence relied on and reasons for revoking probation,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.