Pea v. United States

June 22, 1964

Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1964-06-22

Cited by 71 later decisions (4 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 1979 · most notably Luck v. United States (1965), 62 Cal. 2d 368 - In Re Lopez (1965)

31 federal appellate · 2 district · 24 state decisions

Relies on Jackson v. Denno · Smith v. Crouse

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1964-06-22

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Henry Lincoln Johnson, Jr., for petitioner.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and Jerome Nelson, for the United States.

On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings in conformity with the opinion of this Court in Jackson v. Denno, 378 U.S. 368, 84 S.Ct. 1774.

¶2

Mr. Justice BLACK, Mr. Justice CLARK, Mr. Justice HARLAN and Mr. Justice STEWART dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Jackson v. Denno, supra.